New York has no codified VCPR statute or regulation — the only text on point is NYSED Office of the Professions Guideline 5.11, non-binding agency guidance naming three ways to become acquainted with a patient: an examination, or a visit by the veterinarian or the patient.
None of the three specifies whether the examination may happen remotely, and no telehealth or telemedicine term appears anywhere in the guideline.
Guideline 5.12 ties continued prescribing to a one-year re-examination clock, and Guideline 5.14 requires DEA registration for controlled substances.
Verify before you rely on this
At a glance
Guideline 5.11 lists three ways a veterinarian can become personally acquainted with a patient — a timely examination of the patient, medically appropriate and timely visits by the veterinarian to the operation where the patient is managed, or medically appropriate and timely visits by the patient to the veterinary facility — and never says whether the examination itself may be conducted remotely.
Not addressed. None of the three pathways in Guideline 5.11 uses the words "telehealth," "telemedicine," or "electronic" in connection with establishing the relationship, so the guideline neither authorizes nor forecloses a remote examination. The only "electronic" language on the page concerns electronic signatures and records under Guideline 5.15, which is unrelated to how the relationship is established.
Not addressed for the relationship generally, but Guideline 5.12(3) puts a re-examination clock on continued prescribing: a drug should not be prescribed for more than one year from the date of the examination that supported it, unless a subsequent examination is conducted and a continued need is determined.
Not addressed.
Guideline 5.12 permits prescribing, delivering, or having prescription drugs delivered only once a VCPR is established, sets requirements for what a written prescription must contain, and caps continued prescribing at one year from the supporting examination absent a follow-up exam. It does not separately address prescribing by telehealth.
Guideline 5.14 requires current registration with the federal Drug Enforcement Administration to prescribe, dispense, deliver, or order any controlled substance, with a narrow exception letting a DEA-unregistered veterinarian administer one under a DEA-registered veterinarian's direction and supervision. It does not address controlled substances by telehealth specifically.
Guideline 5.11 itself carries no effective date and is described as current NYSED agency guidance, not a dated statute or regulation — the page discloses that "Law, rules and regulations, not Guidelines, specify the requirements for practice." Other guidelines on the same page do carry dates (Guideline 5.13 is marked "NB Effective June 15, 2024," and the page references a March 15, 1999 memorandum explaining the guidelines' general purpose), but neither applies to 5.11's VCPR definition.
The text is silent on modality — Non-binding agency guidance.
No codified statute or regulation exists in Education Law Article 135 or 8 NYCRR Parts 29/62. NYSED Office of the Professions Guideline 5.11, live on op.nysed.gov, is the only text on point.
New York's practice act and its regulations are silent on the VCPR by name — Education Law Article 135 and 8 NYCRR Parts 29/62 contain no VCPR or telemedicine text at all.
The only document that defines the relationship is NYSED Guideline 5.11, which names three ways a veterinarian can become personally acquainted with a patient: a timely examination of the patient, medically appropriate and timely visits by the veterinarian to the operation where the patient is managed, or medically appropriate and timely visits by the patient to the veterinary facility.
None of the three says whether the examination itself may be conducted remotely — the guideline states what has to happen, not how.
A practice manager building an intake policy in New York is working from non-binding guidance rather than a statute or board rule, and from wording that leaves the modality question unresolved rather than settling it.
“A VCPR exists when all of the following are satisfied: 1. The veterinarian has assumed the responsibility for making medical judgments regarding the health of the patient with the assent of the owner of the animal or their duly authorized agent. 2. The veterinarian has sufficient knowledge of the patient to initiate at least a general or preliminary diagnosis of the medical condition of the patient. This means that the veterinarian is personally acquainted with the keeping and care of the patient by virtue of: a. a timely examination of the patient by the veterinarian, or b. medically appropriate and timely visits by the veterinarian to the operation where the patient is managed, or c. medically appropriate and timely visits by the patient to the veterinary facility where the veterinarian is working. 3. The veterinarian is readily available for follow-up evaluation and oversight of treatment and outcomes, or has arranged for appropriate continuing care and treatment. 4. Patient records are maintained.”
None of the three pathways in Guideline 5.11 uses the words "telehealth," "telemedicine," or "electronic" in connection with establishing the relationship, and that absence is verifiable on the face of the text — the same silence this series finds in states whose statutes use near-identical examination-or-visit wording.
That silence is a real answer about the guideline and an open question about the practice: nothing in it authorizes establishing the relationship over video, and nothing in it forbids that either.
The only "electronic" language anywhere on the NYSED page concerns electronic signatures and records under Guideline 5.15, a recordkeeping provision unrelated to how the relationship itself is established.
A practice cannot cite Guideline 5.11 as authority for a remote-only intake, and New York cannot cite it as a prohibition — confirm how NYSED or the state board would read it before building on either assumption.
Guideline 5.11 says nothing about maintaining an established relationship by telehealth, but Guideline 5.12(3) puts a real clock on the prescribing that flows from it: a drug should not be prescribed for a period of more than one year from the date the veterinarian examined the patient and prescribed it, unless a subsequent examination is conducted and a continued need for the drug is determined.
That is a re-examination requirement tied to the prescription rather than an explicit statement about telehealth, but it is the closest thing in the sources read to a maintenance rule.
A relationship maintained by telehealth still has to come back to an examination within that year to keep a chronic prescription current.
“Drugs should not be prescribed for a duration that is inconsistent with the patient's medical condition. The drug should not be prescribed for a period of more than one year from the date that you have examined the patient and prescribed the drug, unless you have conducted a subsequent examination of the patient and determined that there is a continued need for the prescribed drug.”
Guideline 5.12 tells veterinarians to prescribe, deliver, or have delivered prescription drugs only once a VCPR is established under Guideline 5.11's three-pathway standard, and it sets out what a written prescription must contain.
It does not separately address whether that prescribing may happen by telehealth once the relationship exists.
Guideline 5.14 adds a controlled-substance-specific requirement alongside this: a veterinarian must be currently registered with the federal Drug Enforcement Administration to prescribe, dispense, deliver, or order a controlled substance, with a narrow exception letting a DEA-unregistered veterinarian administer one under a DEA-registered veterinarian's direction and supervision.
Neither guideline addresses controlled-substance prescribing by telehealth specifically.
“not prescribe, dispense, deliver, or order any controlled substance unless you are currently registered with the Federal Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA).”
New York does have a general telehealth statute, but it does not cover veterinarians.
Section 2999-CC's "telehealth provider" definition is an enumerated list of licensed human-health professions — physicians, physician assistants, dentists, nurse practitioners, registered nurses in a monitoring-only capacity, podiatrists, optometrists, psychologists, social workers, speech-language pathologists and audiologists, midwives, physical therapists, occupational therapists, plus several certified-educator and facility categories — and veterinarians are not on it.
Do not describe New York as having a telehealth law that covers veterinary practice; the Public Health Law and the NYSED guideline are two separate, non-overlapping documents.
There are two VCPRs, and the federal one does not move
This page describes New York’s own text — No codified statute or regulation exists in Education Law Article 135 or 8 NYCRR Parts 29/62. NYSED Office of the Professions Guideline 5.11, live on op.nysed.gov, is the only text on point. as read for this series, current as of September 2026, with the provision itself last changed Guideline 5.11 itself carries no effective date and is described as current NYSED agency guidance, not a dated statute or regulation — the page discloses that "Law, rules and regulations, not Guidelines, specify the requirements for practice." Other guidelines on the same page do carry dates (Guideline 5.13 is marked "NB Effective June 15, 2024," and the page references a March 15, 1999 memorandum explaining the guidelines' general purpose), but neither applies to 5.11's VCPR definition. It does not cover licensure, scope of practice, or the terms of a specific prescription, and it is not a compliance sign-off for a telemedicine service.
VCPR and telemedicine rules are the fastest-moving area this site covers — nine states changed theirs between 2024 and 2026, and bills are live in others. Confirm the current text with the board before you build an intake policy, a prescribing workflow or a remote-care service on it, and read the federal note above alongside it rather than instead of it.
The guideline does not say.
NYSED Guideline 5.11 lists three ways to become personally acquainted with a patient — an examination, or a visit by the veterinarian or by the patient — and none of the three specifies whether the examination itself may happen remotely.
No telehealth or telemedicine term appears anywhere in the guideline, so the silence neither permits nor forecloses a video-established relationship.
Confirm how NYSED or the state board reads it before building a service on either assumption.
No. Guideline 5.11 is NYSED Office of the Professions agency guidance, not a statute or a board rule, and the guideline page says so itself: "Law, rules and regulations, not Guidelines, specify the requirements for practice." New York has no codified VCPR provision anywhere in Education Law Article 135 or its regulations.
That makes the guidance the only text on point, but a reader should know it does not carry the force of law the way a statute in another state would.
No. New York's Public Health Law § 2999-CC defines "telehealth provider" as an enumerated list of licensed human-health professions — physicians, nurse practitioners, dentists, and similar — and veterinarians are not on that list.
The state's only veterinary-specific text is the NYSED guideline discussed on this page, which is separate from the Public Health Law's telehealth article entirely.
Guideline 5.12 permits prescribing only once a VCPR is established, and 5.12(3) bars prescribing a drug for more than one year past the supporting examination unless a follow-up exam confirms continued need.
Guideline 5.14 requires current DEA registration to prescribe, dispense, deliver, or order any controlled substance, with a narrow exception for a DEA-unregistered veterinarian acting under a registered veterinarian's direction.
Neither guideline addresses telehealth prescribing specifically — confirm the current text with NYSED.
Guideline 5.11 itself carries no effective date — it is current NYSED agency guidance, not a dated statute or regulation, and the VCPR definition it contains has no revision date in the text retrieved.
Other guidelines on the same page do carry dates: Guideline 5.13 is marked "NB Effective June 15, 2024," and the page references a March 15, 1999 memorandum explaining the guidelines' general purpose, but neither applies to 5.11.
Because it is guidance rather than law, it can be revised by the agency without the rulemaking process a statute would require — confirm the current text directly with NYSED.
Sourced from New York’s own statute or board rule (see the citations above). Verified September 2026. This page is general information, not legal advice — confirm current rules with the New York board before relying on them.