Pennsylvania has no non-compete statute for the general workforce, so a veterinarian's covenant is presumed to be judged under Pennsylvania common-law reasonableness principles, though the sources behind this page do not identify a leading Pennsylvania case applying that test.
The state's only enacted non-compete law, Act 74 of 2024 (the Fair Contracting for Health Care Practitioners Act), voids certain covenants — but its own definition names five license types, and veterinarians are not one of them.
No wage threshold or duration cap for veterinarians is stated in the sources read.
Mechanics, not a verdict on your contract
At a glance
Permitted — judged on reasonableness
Court decisions (no governing statute) — No general non-compete statute governs Pennsylvania veterinarians; presumed common-law reasonableness, with no leading Pennsylvania case identified in the sources read. Pennsylvania's only enacted non-compete statute, Act of Jul. 17, 2024, P.L. 846, No. 74 (the Fair Contracting for Health Care Practitioners Act), § 3, defines "health care practitioner" as five license types and does not name veterinarians..
Healthcare statute reaches veterinarians: No — the healthcare statute's own definitions leave veterinarians out.
Pennsylvania has no non-compete statute for the general workforce; the sources read for this page do not identify a leading Pennsylvania case, so a veterinarian's covenant is presumed to fall under common-law reasonableness rather than a confirmed statutory or judicial test. Pennsylvania's only enacted non-compete statute, Act 74 of 2024, voids a covered health care practitioner's non-compete, but its § 3 names five license types that do not include veterinarians.
No. Act 74 of 2024 § 3 defines "health care practitioner" as five license types: medical doctor, doctor of osteopathy, certified registered nurse anesthetist, certified registered nurse practitioner, and physician assistant. Veterinarians are not among them, so § 4(a)'s voiding rule does not reach a veterinarian's covenant.
No income threshold in Act 74. Its § 4(b) exception — enforceable if the covenant runs one year or less and the practitioner was not dismissed — applies only to the five listed practitioner types, not veterinarians.
Not stated in the sources read.
Not stated in the sources read.
Not stated in the sources read for a veterinarian. Act 74 § 4(c) carves a sale-of-business/ownership-transfer exception out of its health care practitioner ban, but that carve-out sits inside a ban that does not reach veterinarians in the first place.
Not stated in the sources read.
Act of Jul. 17, 2024, P.L. 846, No. 74 — enacted July 17, 2024; effective January 1, 2025 for covenants entered into after that date.
“entered into after the effective date of this subsection is deemed contrary to the public policy and is void and unenforceable by an employer.”
Pennsylvania has not enacted a general non-compete statute that reaches veterinarians.
Pennsylvania's only enacted non-compete statute, Act 74 of 2024, voids a covered health care practitioner's non-compete under § 4(a) — but § 3 limits "health care practitioner" to five license types, none of them veterinary medicine.
Absent a governing statute, a veterinarian's covenant in Pennsylvania is presumed to fall under the state's common-law reasonableness tradition.
The sources read for this page do not identify a leading Pennsylvania case that sets out the specific factors a court would weigh for a veterinarian's covenant.
For an associate reading an offer or a relief veterinarian comparing agreements, that means there is no fixed statutory duration, mileage radius, or wage threshold to check a covenant against in Pennsylvania.
“entered into after the effective date of this subsection is deemed contrary to the public policy and is void and unenforceable by an employer.”
Section 3 of Act 74 defines "health care practitioner" as five license types: medical doctor, doctor of osteopathy, certified registered nurse anesthetist, certified registered nurse practitioner, and physician assistant.
Section 4(a) then voids a covered practitioner's non-compete entered into after the Act's effective date.
Veterinarians, licensed separately from those five categories, are not named anywhere in § 3's list, so § 4(a)'s voiding rule does not reach a veterinarian's covenant.
Section 5 also requires an employer to notify a departed practitioner's patients within 90 days — another duty scoped to the same five license types, not to a veterinary employer.
“entered into after the effective date of this subsection is deemed contrary to the public policy and is void and unenforceable by an employer.”
Act 74 sets no income threshold anywhere in its text, so a veterinarian's covenant is not measured against a wage figure under this Act.
For the five practitioner types § 3 does cover, § 4(b) lets an otherwise-voided covenant be enforced if it runs one year or less and the practitioner was not dismissed by the employer.
That exception is written for the five listed practitioner types only; it does not set a duration or dismissal-based condition for a veterinarian's covenant.
Act 74 was enacted July 17, 2024 and took effect January 1, 2025 for covenants entered into after that date.
It is the only non-compete legislation Pennsylvania has enacted in the sources read for this page, and it added protections for five health care practitioner license types — not veterinarians and not the general workforce.
For a veterinarian, Act 74 is mainly a reason to discount headlines about a Pennsylvania healthcare non-compete ban, not a change to the rule that actually governs a veterinary covenant.
The research behind this page confirms Pennsylvania has no general non-compete statute for veterinarians and reads the state's health care practitioner-only non-compete provision, but it does not identify a leading Pennsylvania case setting out the reasonableness factors a court would apply to a veterinarian's covenant, a wage or salary threshold, a statutory duration or geographic limit, how Pennsylvania treats a veterinarian's covenant tied to selling a practice or an ownership interest, or how client and staff non-solicitation clauses are handled.
Those gaps matter most at a buy-in or buy-out, where a covenant may be drafted alongside the purchase terms.
They are left blank here rather than filled from another state's rule or from memory — take them to a Pennsylvania attorney with the whole agreement in hand.
Have the agreement itself reviewed
The reasonableness test, what a radius is measured from, the access-to-care argument, and the difference between a non-compete and a non-solicitation clause are covered in the national guide to veterinary non-competes. This page covers only what is specific to Pennsylvania.
No. Pennsylvania has not enacted a general non-compete statute that reaches veterinarians.
Its only enacted non-compete statute, Act 74 of 2024, voids certain covenants under § 4(a), but § 3 limits that rule to five license types that do not include veterinary medicine.
Absent a governing statute, a veterinarian's covenant is presumed to fall under Pennsylvania's common-law reasonableness tradition.
Have a Pennsylvania attorney who handles veterinary employment agreements read your specific covenant against that standard.
No. Act 74 of 2024 § 3 defines "health care practitioner" as medical doctors, doctors of osteopathy, certified registered nurse anesthetists, certified registered nurse practitioners, and physician assistants — five categories only.
Veterinarians are licensed separately and are not named in that list, so § 4(a)'s voiding rule and § 4(b)'s one-year exception do not apply to a veterinarian's covenant.
Ask a Pennsylvania attorney to confirm how the Act currently reads.
The sources read for this page do not identify one.
Act 74 sets no wage threshold for the five health care practitioner types it does cover, and it does not reach veterinarians at all.
Because Pennsylvania's general rule for a veterinarian is presumed to be common-law reasonableness without an identified leading case, there is no confirmed figure to check a specific contract against.
A licensed Pennsylvania attorney can tell you what applies to your agreement.
The sources read for this page do not directly answer that for a veterinarian.
Act 74 § 4(c) carves a sale-of-business/ownership-transfer exception out of its health care practitioner ban, but that ban does not reach veterinarians in the first place, so the exception does not establish how Pennsylvania treats a veterinarian's practice-sale covenant.
Before signing a buy-in or buy-out agreement, have a Pennsylvania attorney who handles veterinary practice transactions review the covenant and the purchase agreement together.
The confirmed change on record for this page is Act 74 of 2024, enacted July 17, 2024 and effective January 1, 2025 for covenants entered into after that date.
It voids certain non-competes for five listed practitioner types and does not reach veterinarians.
This page was last verified in September 2026; confirm the current text and ask an attorney before relying on it.
Sourced from Pennsylvania’s own statute or leading court decisions (see the citations above). Verified September 2026; the governing provision was last amended Act of Jul. 17, 2024, P.L. 846, No. 74 — enacted July 17, 2024; effective January 1, 2025 for covenants entered into after that date. This page is general information, not legal advice.